Tripling of western US particulate pollution from wildfires in a warming climate

Wildfire particulate pollution

Fine particulate matter (PM2.5) are particles with a size of 2.5 microns or less. Due to their very small size, they can bypass many of our body’s defences, travel deeply into the respiratory tract and eventually enter our bloodstream, which makes them particularly dangerous for human health. Severe episodes of air pollution caused by emissions of these small particles can also have important implications for climate and ecosystems1-4.

Today, wildfires contribute to 15-30% of atmospheric primary PM2.5 emissions in the United States”5. During the 21st century, a warmer climate is projected to enhance wildfire activity over the western US6-10. However, few studies have yet estimated the future fire emissions of PM2.5, and thus projections of future air quality usually neglect the impacts of changing fires.

This new study, supported by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and ESM2025 EU-funded project, applies a new empirical statistical model to future wildfire projections provided by three Earth system models to simulate the impacts of fire emissions on future air pollution in the western US.

 
 

 

 

WARMING CLIMATE CONTRIBUTES TO INCREASING WILDFIRE ACTIVITY

Four Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSP) emission-based scenarios have been used to explore future changes in climate and wildfire activity during the 21st century: SSP1-2.6 (low emissions scenario with ~1.8ºC warming by 210011), SSP2-4.5 (intermediate emissions scenario with ~2.7ºC warming by 210011), SSP3-7.0 (high emissions scenario with ~3.6 ºC warming by 210011) and SSP5-8.5 (very high emissions scenario with ~4.4ºC warming by 210011).

Future climate projections for western North America, under a scenario based on a fossil-fuelled development with high emissions of greenhouse gases, estimate a lengthening of the fire season, as well as a 7.5ºC warming during late summer to fall when annual fire emissions peak. This warming would lead to an enhancement of evaporative demand and water use by vegetation, with soil moisture decreasing by ~10%. Simultaneously, atmospheric CO2 fertilisation, temperature and land use change would drive a ~50% increase of vegetation carbon mass. Both a drier soil and increased vegetation mass are favourable conditions for fires.

According to this study, by the end of the 21st century, these climatic impact drivers along with socioeconomic factors (such as population growth and density), would lead to a 110-250% increase in CO2 emissions from fires, with fire burned area expanding by 50-120%, depending on the climate change scenario and model considered.

INCREASED WILDFIRE ACTIVITY COULD CONTRIBUTE TO UNHEALTHY LEVELS OF FINE PARTICLES IN THE ATMOSPHERE

Xie and co-workers developed a multiple linear regression model (or an empirical statistical model) to predict future PM2.5 levels from fire CO2 emissions and meteorology results provided by three CMIP6 Earth System models. They based their work on historical observations, the link between the interannual variability of PM2.5 means and extremes at US surface sites and regional versus local fires, and meteorological conditions.

With their new approach, the team found that the future increase in CO2 emissions from fires and changes in meteorology due to climate change may lead to a doubling or tripling of mean fine particle levels over the US Pacific Northwest during late-summer to fall, with unhealthy daily levels of 55-150 µg/m3 possibly becoming the new norm.

Under the high emissions scenario, models predict that 72-96% of Pacific Northwest sites will experience daily PM2.5 extremes above the 35 µg/m3 US national standard, with 52-68% of the sites exceeding the unhealthy level of 55 µg/m3 by 2080-2100. Even for the intermediate emissions scenario, US national standard levels are expected to be exceeded already by mid-century.

Changes in the 10-year running average of (a) total fire CO2 emissions and (b) burned area, relative to the 1990-2010 averages in August-September over western North America from CNRM-ESM2-1 simulations. c) Projected PM2.5 extremes (95th percentile) using MLR empirical model driven by fires from CNRM-ESM2-1 model under SSP5-8.5 (very high emission scenario).
FUTURE FINE PARTICLE AIR POLLUTION DEPENDS ON FUTURE WARMING

Between 2017 and 2021, four severe fire years over the western US caused historical fine particle pollution extremes, raising “the possibility that climate change is already driving strong changes in fire regimes”. This study suggests that, even under a climate change scenario considering intermediate emissions, fine particle air pollution extremes may occur every 5 years by the end of the 21st century, with strong implications for public health.

This work highlights the fact that when committing to a particular level of future warming, we are also committing to a particular level of fine particle air pollution. Less gloomily, the large spread in fine particle pollution across climate change scenarios also emphasises the co-benefits of climate change mitigation in reducing wildfire activity and air pollution.

Significant efforts and cooperation between stakeholders on multiple fields, including climate mitigation, regional air quality and forest management, are paramount to adapt to and to minimise potential adverse health impacts related to fine particle air pollution, as well as to tackle future wildfire-related challenges.

Xie, Y., M. Lin, B. Decharme, C. Delire, L. W. Horowitz, D. M. Lawrence, F. Li, and R. Séférian (2022) Tripling of western US particulate pollution from wildfires in a warming climate. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 119, e2111372119, doi:10.1073/pnas.2111372119

About the authors

Yuanyu Xie conducted this work with Meiyun Lin and Larry W. Horowitz, researchers at the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Bertrand Decharme, Christine Delire and Roland Séférian, researchers at the Centre National de Recherches Météorologiques, in France, David M. Lawrence, researcher at the US National Center for Atmospheric Research, and Fang Li, researcher at the International Center for Climate and Environment Sciences in China.

1 D. M. J. S. Bowman et al., Vegetation fires in the Anthropocene. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment 1, 500-515 (2020).

2F. H. Johnston et al., Estimated Global Mortality Attributable to Smoke from Landscape Fires. Environmental Health Perspectives 120, 695-701 (2012).

3M. Burke et al., The changing risk and burden of wildfire in the United States. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118, e2011048118 (2021).

4G. P. Schill et al., Widespread biomass burning smoke throughout the remote troposphere. Nature Geoscience 13, 422-427 (2020).

5USEPA, Data from the 2017 National Emissions Inventory. https://www.epa.gov/air-emissions-inventories/2017-national-emissions-inventory-nei-data (2017).

6B. Ford et al., Future Fire Impacts on Smoke Concentrations, Visibility, and Health in the Contiguous United States. GeoHealth 2, 229-247 (2018).

7E. N. Stavros, J. T. Abatzoglou, D. McKenzie, N. K. Larkin, Regional projections of the likelihood of very large wildland fires under a changing climate in the contiguous Western United States. Climatic Change 126, 455-468 (2014).

8J. T. Abatzoglou, A. P. Williams, R. Barbero, Global Emergence of Anthropogenic Climate Change in Fire Weather Indices. Geophysical Research Letters 46, 326-336 (2019).

9X. Yue, L. J. Mickley, J. A. 725 Logan, J. O. Kaplan, Ensemble projections of wildfire activity and carbonaceous aerosol concentrations over the western United States in the mid-21st century. Atmospheric Environment 77, 767-780 (2013).

10J. S. Littell, D. McKenzie, H. Y. Wan, S. A. Cushman, Climate Change and Future Wildfire in the Western United States: An Ecological Approach to Non stationarity. Earth’s Future 6, 1097-1111 (2018).

11IPCC, 2021: Summary for Policymakers. In: Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Masson-Delmotte, V., P. Zhai, A. Pirani, S.L. Connors, C. Péan, S. Berger, N. Caud, Y. Chen, L. Goldfarb, M.I. Gomis, M. Huang, K. Leitzell, E. Lonnoy, J.B.R. Matthews, T.K. Maycock, T. Waterfield, O. Yelekçi, R. Yu, and B. Zhou (eds.)]. In Press.